翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ Bonita Springs, Florida
・ Bonita Unified School District
・ Bonita Vista High School
・ Bonita, Arizona
・ Bonita, California
・ Bonita, Kansas
・ Bonita, Louisiana
・ Bonita, Madera County, California
・ Bonita, Texas
・ Bonita, Wisconsin
・ Bonitasaura
・ Bonito
・ Bonito (album)
・ Bonito (disambiguation)
・ Bonito Airport
Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.
・ Bonito de Minas
・ Bonito de Santa Fé
・ Bonito Lake
・ Bonito Oriental
・ Bonito Phase
・ Bonito River
・ Bonito River (Alonzo River)
・ Bonito River (Caceribu River)
・ Bonito River (Canoinhas River)
・ Bonito River (Correntes River)
・ Bonito River (Goiás)
・ Bonito River (Ivaí River)
・ Bonito River (Macaé River)
・ Bonito River (Rio das Flores)


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc. : ウィキペディア英語版
Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.

''Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.'', 489 U.S. 141 (1989), is a decision of the United States Supreme Court holding a state anti-plug molding law preempted because it partially duplicated and therefore interfered with the balance Congress had struck by federal patent law. The decision reaffirmed the Supreme Court’s earlier decision in ''Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Stiffel Co.'',〔376 U.S. 225 (1964).〕 which held a state unfair competition law preempted on the same ground.
==Background==

Bonito Boats developed a hull design for a fiberglass recreational boat and marketed it as the "Bonito 5VBR." The manufacturing process involved creating a hardwood model that was then sprayed with fiberglass to create a mold. The mold then served to produce the finished fiberglass boats for sale. No patent application was filed to protect the utilitarian or design aspects of the hull or the manufacturing process by which the finished boats were produced.〔489 U.S. at 144〕
After the Bonito 5VBR had been on the market for six years, the Florida Legislature enacted a "plug molding" statute that prohibits the use of a direct molding process to duplicate unpatented boat hulls, and forbids the knowing sale of hulls so duplicated. Bonito Boats then filed an action in a Florida Circuit Court, alleging that Thunder Craft Boats had violated the statute by using the direct molding process to duplicate the Bonito 5VBR fiberglass hull and by knowingly selling such duplicates. Bonito Boats sought damages, injunctive relief, and an award of attorney's fees under the Florida law.〔489 U.S. at 144-45.〕
The Circuit Court granted Thunder Craft's s motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the statute conflicted with federal patent law, and was therefore invalid under the Supremacy Clause of the Federal Constitution. The Florida Court of Appeals and the Florida Supreme Court affirmed.〔489 U.S. at 145.〕
The Federal Circuit had reached a contrary result in ''Interpart Corp. v. Italia'',〔777 F.2d 678 (Fed. Cir. 1985)〕 upholding a California law prohibiting plug molding. The Supreme Court granted ''certiorari'' to resolve the conflict.〔489 U.S. at 144.〕

抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc.」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.